Sunday, April 13, 2008

change - the buzz word.

Yesterday morning, i got an sms from my friend Dr Siva:"buy mingguan. interesting interview with muhyiddin." so instead of buying one, i went to the internet and read the interview. Interesting indeed. even the title is "Masa untuk perubahan" (translation: Time for Change). Read on.

Mingguan Malaysia: Interview with TS Muhyiddin Yaasin.

Masa untuk perubahan

MINGGUAN: Bagaimana Tan Sri melihat pencapaian UMNO dan BN dalam pilihan raya kali ini?

MUHYIDDIN: Kita mencapai keputusan yang kurang baik kerana di peringkat Parlimen, Barisan Nasional (BN) hanya menguasai 140 kerusi. Di negeri-negeri pula, banyak kawasan yang dimenangi dengan majoriti agak rendah atau terus kalah. BN kalah teruk di Pulau Pinang, Kedah, Perak, Selangor dan Wilayah Persekutuan.

Di Kelantan prestasi BN bertambah buruk. Di beberapa negeri seperti Negeri Sembilan, BN menguasai 20 kerusi negeri, pembangkang 15. Di Johor walaupun ia dikenali sebagai kubu kuat UMNO, buat pertama kali dalam sejarah ia ditembusi pembangkang. Walaupun kita bersyukur kerana masih berkuasa di peringkat Parlimen, tetapi dalam keadaan tidak mempunyai majoriti dua pertiga, ia adalah kemerosotan paling besar dalam sejarah BN. Ini kerana dua pertiga adalah bagi menunjukkan kekuatan. Biarpun Perdana Menteri menyatakan kita masih menang dengan simple majority, tetapi ia meletakkan kita dalam keadaan tidak kukuh (openly disagreeing with PM Abdullah Badawi). Semua ini musibah yang amat membimbangkan dan cukup bahaya. Ia isyarat bahawa rakyat tidak puas hati dengan BN dan menunjukkan kemarahan melalui peti-peti undi.

Apa langkah yang perlu diambil bagi membaiki keadaan?

MUHYIDDIN: Kita akan mengadakan post-mortem dan berharap ia akan dibuat secara bebas supaya tidak ada pihak yang mengubah suainya untuk kepentingan sesiapa. Kita hendak tahu, apakah sebenarnya yang menyebabkan kita kalah teruk walaupun di peringkat awal orang sudah membuat andaian-andaian. Pertama, mereka sebut soal kepimpinan, mereka menyalahkan Perdana Menteri yang juga Presiden parti dan Pengerusi BN. Mereka juga mengaitkan dengan apa yang sering disebut 'fakta KJ'. Mungkin ia tidak betul atau persepsi tetapi dalam pilihan raya dan politik, persepsi itu penting.

Kita boleh kata kita sudah bangunkan negara selama 50 tahun, bawa banyak pembangunan dan nikmat. Tetapi kenapa rakyat tolak kita? Itulah yang harus difikirkan. Apakah mungkin kita memahami ada beberapa perubahan besar dari segi pemikiran rakyat iaitu generasi selepas merdeka dan generasi baru yang umumnya dikatakan tidak menyokong BN?

Ada rakyat yang mengatakan kepimpinan BN tidak menyerlah, lemah dan tidak berupaya menangani keadaan semasa. Ada yang sebut soal-soal berkaitan ketelusan, hak kebebasan dan nilai-nilai baru yang mungkin kita tidak sedari mulai menyerap dalam pemikiran generasi baru. Kita masih berfikiran lama. Orang sudah berubah, kita tidak berubah.

Oleh itu, mereka lebih kritikal terhadap apa yang kita lakukan. Bagi sesetengah pengundi, mereka tidak lihat pembangunan sebagai keutamaan. Mereka lihat aspek-aspek lain seperti harga barang, sistem kehakiman, kebebasan bersuara, soal mengongkong yang dilakukan oleh kepimpinan kerajaan dan macam-macam lagi.

Maknanya, kalau BN hendak menarik perhatian pengundi, parti itu perlu melakukan perubahan?

MUHYIDDIN: Ketika ini orang bercakap soal kepimpinan sama ada kepimpinan Perdana Menteri mahupun komponen BN sehingga memungkinkan mereka menolak UMNO, MCA, MIC dan Gerakan di beberapa peringkat. Apakah perlu satu perubahan? Di banyak negara bila ada pilihan raya tema paling popular ialah change dan dalam pilihan raya lalu pihak pembangkang menggunakan tema perubahan.

Di peringkat kita sekarang, harus menilai apakah perlu ada perubahan. Itu persoalan yang cukup kritikal yang perlu ditimbang semasak-masaknya. Ada orang kata kita perlu merombak semula parti untuk menyesuaikan dengan situasi pemikiran dan keadaan semasa. Ini memerlukan satu rombakan dari segi pemikiran dan minda bagi membolehkan UMNO terus relevan.

Contohnya, orang kata parti-parti komponen bersama BN kalah kerana mereka terlalu didominasikan oleh UMNO. UMNO menjadi teras kerajaan dan banyak polisi hanya melibatkan kepentingan orang UMNO dan Melayu sahaja. Jadi saya fikir kita perlu teliti balik kenyataan seumpama ini dan perbaiki.

Kalau kita mahu membantu parti komponen BN kita harus lihat bagaimana hendak membantu mereka. UMNO tidak boleh bersendirian dalam situasi yang sudah berubah ini. Kita memerlukan sokongan masyarakat bukan Melayu. Jadi ini memerlukan rombakan dari segi pengurusan dalam BN. Saya sudah syorkan dalam mesyuarat pengurusan parti supaya kita membentuk pelan tindakan memperkukuhkan semula UMNO dan BN.

Ia bukanlah sesuatu yang dibincangkan secara ad hoc sebaliknya satu pasukan diwujudkan bagi menggubal pembentukan semula pendekatan kita sama ada dalam parti mahupun kerajaan.

Apakah pembentukan semula ini turut menuntut supaya kepimpinan parti juga perlu berubah seperti mana didesak oleh banyak pihak?

MUHYIDDIN: Saya lihat dengan jelas perasaan tidak senang hati terhadap kepimpinan parti. Saya sebut ini bukan saya cakap tetapi berdasarkan kepada maklumat yang dikumpul. Dalam percakapan mereka yang dilakukan secara terbuka dan ikhlas tanpa 'digagahi' oleh mana-mana pihak, satu perkara pokok yang disebut ialah soal kepimpinan. Di luar parti pun ada yang bercakap perkara yang sama, dikaitkan dengan masalah keluarga dan sistem yang diamalkan.

Justeru saya bimbang jika tidak ada satu perubahan berlaku seperti mana yang bukan sahaja dituntut oleh UMNO tetapi orang luar UMNO, rakyat akan terus tolak BN dan UMNO. Oleh itu, ahli parti harus fikir secara matang, Perdana Menteri sudah buat kenyataan. Pertama, beliau akan pergi bila sampai waktunya. Kedua, beliau menyebut Datuk Seri Najib bakal penggantinya. Ketiga, beliau kata, ''beri saya sedikit masa untuk perbetulkan parti sebelum saya menyerahkan parti kepada pengganti saya.''

Ramai berkata, itu bagus dan jelas dari segi pelan peralihan kuasa tetapi mereka juga bertanya, bila?

Saya fikir ada satu perasaan membuak-buak di peringkat bawah iaitu perasaan tidak puas hati yang ketara. Oleh itu saya berpendapat, kalau tidak berlaku perubahan dalam UMNO maka banyak perkara tidak baik akan terjadi. Justeru saya takut jika saya tidak bercakap dengan benar, ia akhirnya boleh membawa bencana kepada orang Melayu dan UMNO.

Sebab itu saya perlu bersuara walaupun tidak lantang tetapi tegas dan jelas kerana apabila saya bercakap ini, saya tidak melihat (membayangkan) muka sesiapa, sama ada muka Pak Lah, Najib, Muhyiddin atau Mat Taib atau mana-mana pemimpin UMNO. Apa yang saya bimbang ialah UMNO dan orang Melayu akan kalah. Saya benar-benar takut kalau saya tidak mengatakan yang hak (benar) walaupun yang hak itu adalah pahit maka UMNO boleh terjerumus ke dalam keadaan lebih teruk.

Bukan setakat terjerumus tetapi disebabkan UMNO tidak lagi unggul maka UMNO akan hilang kuasa. Saya bertemu ramai tokoh, mereka berkata kalau tidak berlaku apa-apa perubahan, kita akan kalah lebih teruk.

Sebab itu saya rasa bertanggungjawab untuk bersuara walaupun mungkin ada pihak yang membaca kenyataan saya ini, ia satu yang mungkin agak luar biasa tetapi akhirnya saya harus menyatakan perkara yang benar. Tetapi saya menyerahkan kepada kebijaksanaan kepimpinan untuk memikirkan bagaimana caranya (peralihan dilakukan).

Mungkin sesetengah menganggap kenapa perlu UMNO melakukan perubahan kerana turun naik adalah adat dalam pilihan raya.

MUHYIDDIN: Jangan anggap situasi sekarang adalah biasa, mungkin kita dibuai oleh lagu-lagu lama seperti dondang sayang dan rentak-rentak Mawi, maka kita lupa sedangkan situasi sekarang agak berbeza. Apa yang terjadi sekarang adalah luar biasa, kita tidak boleh memperkecilkan gerakan parti pembangkang. Mereka mendapat semangat baru, mereka boleh tumbangkan kerajaan BN, sudah ada Pakatan Rakyat diwujudkan.

Saya pernah sebut PKR hanya ada nafas ikan, saya salah. Banyak pihak kepimpinan kita pun membuat tafsiran salah. Mereka bukan sahaja ada nafas baru malahan kekuatan baru. Jadi kita harus fikir secara drastik untuk mencari formula terbaik untuk selesaikan masalah ini. Dalam soal ini kita ambil pendekatan berhemah. Kalau tarik rambut dalam tepung, rambut jangan putus, tepung jangan berselerak, itu peribahasa yang cukup tepat dalam situasi sekarang.

Persoalannya, modus operandi dan caranya bagaimana? Ia lebih terletak di atas bahu Presiden parti. Kami dalam barisan kepimpinan yang lain bersedia memikul amanah besar, bukan untuk diri saya atau Datuk Seri Najib atau sesiapa tetapi untuk orang Melayu. Dalam situasi ini semua orang harus berfikir mengenai kepentingan parti, bukannya nasib mana-mana individu.

Sekarang adalah waktu kita bersemuka dengan fakta sebenar dan menyatakan kebenaran, kalau tidak bencana lebih besar boleh menimpa kita.

Sejauh manakah ahli UMNO akan menerima apa yang Tan Sri cakapkan ini dan adakah peralihan kepimpinan boleh menyelesaikan masalah?

MUHYIDDIN: Saya meninjau di banyak tempat dan mendapat banyak maklum balas serta ditemui banyak pihak. Selain Khidmat Pesanan Ringkas (SMS) dan panggilan telefon, mereka yang saya temui berpandangan begitu. Mereka kata Tan Sri mesti cepat buat sesuatu, cakap terus terang, berkata yang benar.

Saya sudah buat apa yang sepatutnya saya buat, saya fikir saya tidak keseorangan dalam hal ini. Cuma dalam UMNO sudah ada satu adat dan cara kita yang masih boleh kita gunakan dengan terhormat. Apa yang penting perlu ada ruang kepada kepimpinan baru untuk memulihkan parti sebelum pilihan raya akan datang.

Jadi saya serah kepada kebijaksanaan Presiden parti, beliau yang cakap (untuk serah kepada pengganti), saya rasa dalam hati Perdana Menteri dan Presiden parti beliau akan bersedia dan sedang memikirkan soal ini. Saya berdoa kepada Allah membuka pintu hati Pak Lah untuk berfikir dengan semasak-masaknya. (very polite way of saying - think again PM Abdullah Badawi. think carefully what you need to do next.)

Adakah peralihan itu harus dilakukan pada Disember iaitu ketika pemilihan parti berlangsung sedangkan ia dilihat satu tempoh yang masih lama?

MUHYIDDIN: Itu (pemilihan parti) tidak mengapa, tempoh itu sudah ditetapkan begitu kerana ada sebab-sebab dari segi teknikal. Tetapi proses perubahan dan peralihan boleh dilakukan bila-bila masa. (in other words, it has to be now?!)

Apa yang harus diingat pelbagai perkara lain yang tidak kita ramalkan boleh terjadi. Sama ada jawatan Presiden ditandingi ataupun tidak, Timbalan Presiden akan ditandingi atau tidak, peralihan akan dibuat secara licin ataupun tidak, inilah masanya. Saya berfikir secara mendalam dan jelas kerana sebagai seorang pemimpin dalam UMNO saya harus tahu arah tuju saya, bukan politik saya, tetapi UMNO.

Saya kena tahu di mana saya boleh berperanan. Kenyataan saya tidak bermaksud apa-apa tetapi untuk menyelamatkan UMNO, Melayu dan Islam dalam negara kita, sebab itu saya bersedia untuk bercakap walaupun bagi sesetengah pihak, saya menanggung risiko.

Jadi Tan Sri bersedia menghadapi apa juga risiko dengan memberi pandangan ini?

MUHYIDDIN: Saya sanggup tanggung risiko, itu tidak mengapa, setidak-tidaknya saya sudah menyatakan apa yang hak (benar) kerana ini adalah sesuatu yang perlu dilakukan. Ini bukan soal main-main, tidak pernah berlaku dalam sejarah UMNO dan negara kita berhadapan dengan situasi begini. Bagaimana kalau kuasa politik yang tinggal sedikit dalam tangan kita ini, terlepas daripada genggaman kita, macam mana kita hendak mendapatkannya balik? Seratus tahun belum tentu lagi.

Bolehkah peralihan berlaku sebelum mesyuarat bahagian?

MUHYIDDIN: Saya memetik kenyataan Presiden yang meminta beliau diberi masa untuk memulihkan parti bagi diserahkan kepada Najib. Saya kira kalaupun beliau hendak buat begitu, beliau tidak boleh buat berseorangan. Biarlah kita lakukan. Sekarang adalah waktu kita pula untuk menyumbang dan bekerja keras. Saya bersedia untuk bekerja keras. Semua pemimpin UMNO harus menumpukan perhatian lebih banyak kepada parti daripada kerajaan. Tetapi jangan tinggalkan langsung urusan kerajaan.

Tan Sri dilihat salah seorang yang layak untuk ditonjolkan di peringkat lebih tinggi.

MUHYIDDIN: Saya tidak fikir soal itu, itu terserah kepada ahli-ahli parti. Kalau mereka fikir saya boleh berperanan, saya akan jalankan tanggungjawab itu untuk menyumbang kepada parti di mana juga peringkat tetapi saya tidak minta. Sekarang ini kedudukan saya adalah Naib Presiden, saya bersuara lebih daripada pihak-pihak yang lain, saya tidak kisah. Kadang-kadang ada orang kata saya lebih banyak bersuara daripada Najib, bercakap lebih daripada Pak Lah, tetapi kalau mereka tidak bercakap saya bercakap.

Saya tidak boleh tutup mulut, justeru soal hendak pegang jawatan bukanlah terlalu penting. Namun kalau ditakdirkan oleh Allah saya diberi amanah untuk memegang jawatan lebih tinggi, saya sanggup apa sahaja. Ini bukanlah beban yang selesa. Dalam kedudukan saya, saya tahu apa yang boleh saya buat iaitu bersuara. Kalau dalam agama ini adalah iman yang paling lemah. Agama kata, bertindak itu dan ini tetapi kalau kamu tidak boleh berbuat apa-apa, kamu bersuaralah. Itu yang saya lakukan, terserahlah kepada ahli-ahli memikirkannya.

Ada atau tidak desakan di kalangan ahli UMNO yang mahu Tan Sri bukan sekadar bersuara tetapi lebih daripada itu - bertanding jawatan tinggi?

MUHYIDDIN: Tidak ada desakan tetapi pandangan ada. Kalau mereka melihat saya berani bersuara dan berkata sesuatu yang hak, boleh berperanan penting dan ada gaya kepimpinan itu terserah kepada mereka. Pada waktu ini saya tidak mahu menilai diri saya.

Saya tidak berfikir langsung inilah peluang terbaik untuk masuk bertanding di mana-mana peringkat bagi melawan sesiapa. Namun kalau ahli fikir, Muhyiddin boleh berperanan membantu parti dalam kedudukan mana sekali pun, saya terima. Tetapi penentuan ini bukan saya tetapi mereka dan Allah menentukan, saya hanya bersedia untuk berkorban demi parti. Bagaimanapun apabila tiba masanya, saya hendak membuat keputusan sama ada untuk pertahankan jawatan atau bertanding peringkat lebih tinggi, saya akan umumkan.

Apa nasihat Tan Sri kepada ahli-ahli menjelang pemilihan parti bagi memastikan mereka memilih pemimpin yang benar-benar berwibawa?

MUHYIDDIN: Ini satu proses demokrasi yang harus digunakan sebaik-baiknya untuk meremajakan UMNO, menyuntik semangat baru, membariskan kepimpinan bertenaga dan berwibawa yang boleh memberi kekuatan baru kepada parti agar UMNO terus relevan.

Interesting isnt it? without a doubt, he is making his move. he is positioning himself as the conscience of UMNO - objective and rational. is he really taking a risk? dont think so. nobody is going to censure him. he is the vice president of UMNO. in fact, he is becoming the voice of UMNO members. I remember meeting TS Muhyiddin in the UK more than ten years ago. He attended a talk organised by Kelab UMNO Coventry & Warwick. after the talk, the committee had a close door meeting with him. i remember him being polished and articulate. looks like he still is.

"Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee" - Muhammad Ali

x-factor.

I was in Kajang yesterday with my friend Nazrein. we were there not for satay kajang. but to attend a forum titled: "Krisis Kepimpinan - Mana Silapnya" (translation: Leadership Crisis - What is wrong). It was organised by UMNO Bahagian Hulu Langat. The speakers were Tun Dr Mahathir and Tan Sri Sanusi Junid. so it was no surprise that the hall for the forum was filled to the brim. in fact many had to stand. when Tun M entered the hall, it was pandemonium. shouts of 'Hidup Tun' (translation: Long Live Tun) vibrated throughout the hall. and people rushed forward to shake his hands. it was as if he is still the Prime Minister. This doctor still has the x-factor.

Tan Sri Sanusi spoke first. He said his job that afternoon was to 'warm-up' the audience. Basically he said, here is a man well respected all over the world, and yet condemned in his own country. he related a number of incidences:

one, when he met Prince Saud of Saudi Arabia, he saw that the Prince had many books on Tun M on his bookshelf. The Prince told him that he has very high regards for Tun M.

two, when he was introduced to President Musharaf of Pakistan, the President said to him: " I know you are close to Mahathir. Please advice him not to resign."

three, the Prime Minister of China wanted to appoint him as an advisor to the Chinese Government. Why? so that he would be the bridge between the Chinese Govt and Tun M.

Tan Sri Sanusi went on to talk about what Tun M had done for the country - to instill patriotism, to develop the country etc. and to end his speech, TS Sanusi sang the song 'Warisan' - but with new lyrics. i know this song. when i was in MRSM, we sang 'Warisan' everyday - right after Negaraku. it is a song to remind us of our history. and to remind us about our maruah (dignity) and unity. i have not heard this song for quite sometime. and to hear it again in a forum about the crisis in Malay leadership - very moving. i reproduce here the song for us to contemplate its meaning.

Anak kecil main api,
Terbakar hatinya yang sepi,
Air mata darah bercampur keringat,
Bumi dipijak milik orang

Nenek moyang kaya raya,
Tergadai seluruh harta benda,
Akibat sengketa sesamalah kita,
Cinta lenyap di arus zaman.

Indahnya bumi kita ini,
Warisan berkurun lamanya,
Hasil mengalir ke tangan yang lain,
Peribumi merintih sendiri.

Masa depan sungguh kelam,
Kan lenyap peristiwa semalam,
Tertutuplah hati terkunci mati,
Maruah peribadi dah hilang.

Kini kita cuma tinggal kuasa,
Yang akan menentukan bangsa,
Bersatulah hati, bersama berbakti,
Pulih kembali harga diri.

Kita sudah tiada masa,
Bangunlah dengan gagah perkasa,
Janganlah terlalai teruskan usaha,
Melayu kan gagah di nusantara

By the time for Tun M to speak, the audience was highly charged. Tun M spoke at length on the current state of Malay leadership and unity. He touched on the result of the recent GE with his usual dry humour.

eg: "Not only Kedah is under the opposition, when i want to go back to Alor Star, i have to go thro all opposition states - selangor, perak and pulau pinang."

he reminded UMNO members that if they want to see change, they have to act. and not depend on others to help them. they cannot expect others to act first. they have to act now!

Hate him. or love him. he speaks his mind. and when he speaks, people listen. i did.

Friday, April 11, 2008

Terengganu again.

On Wednesday, the new Terengganu state cabinet was formed. Ten assemblymen were sworn in as state executive councillors (EXCO) and given specific portfolios. Congratulations to all. I sincerely hope they can work well as a team. All we, the rakyat of Terengganu, are asking from you - be honest and committed. nothing more, nothing less.

The State of Terengganu, through its agencies, owns a number of public listed companies. namely - TDM Berhad, EPIC Berhad and Golden Pharos. all of them are listed on the main board of Bursa Malaysia. Overall, these companies are doing pretty well. in fact, TDM announced today that they are acquiring another 30,000 hectares of land in West Kalimantan for oil palm plantation development. am actually proud. indirectly, i feel that i own these companies, maybe 0.0000000000001%.

The chairman of TDM Berhad is Dato Wan Hisham. the chairman of EPIC Berhad is Dato Mohamed Awang Tera. both were appointed in april 2004, right after BN won back the state from PAS. at that time, Dato Wan Hisham was the state EXCO in charge of Infra Development, Public Utilities and Communications. whereas, Dato Mohamed Awang Tera was the state EXCO in charge of Industrial Development and Tourism.

This is where i have a problem. i totally disagree that state EXCOs, who are part of the executive branch, be appointed as chairmen of public listed companies. i have nothing personal against them. and i am not questioning their integrities. but this is an issue of governance. Their chairmenship of these companies are akin to a minister being a chairman of a GLC. can you imagine say, TS Nor Mohamed Yakcop - the 2nd Finance Minister, being chairman of Sime Darby? or Dato Shabery Cheek - Minister of Information, being chairman of Media Prima Bhd.

Dato Wan Hisham lost in the recent GE. So he is ok to continue as chairman of TDM Berhad. Dato Mohamed Awang Tera has been appointed as a state EXCO for another term.

I hope MB Mad Said would not re appoint Dato Awang Tera as chairman of EPIC Berhad. appoint someone who is not part of the executive branch. why not appoint someone from the industry. let state EXCOs concentrate on their main job - serving the people.

Thursday, April 10, 2008

Karpal to the Rescue!

"DAP minta Dr M henti kritikan" (translation: DAP wants Dr M to stop criticising). That is the title of an article in Berita Harian today. That title caught my eyes and compelled me to read.

Karpal Singh said:

Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad tidak sepatutnya mengambil alih tugas pembangkang dengan mengkritik penggantinya, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, secara berterusan kerana beliau sendiri banyak melakukan kesilapan ketika menjadi Perdana Menteri. Pengerusi DAP, Karpal Singh mendakwa, penyalahgunaan kuasa oleh Dr Mahathir diakui pemimpin Umno sendiri termasuk Abdullah yang secara terang mendedahkan bekas Perdana Menteri itu ialah orang bertanggungjawab terhadap Operasi Lalang. "Salah guna kuasa itu antara lain termasuk mengenakan sekatan terhadap kebebasan media, penangkapan dan penahanan 106 ahli politik, pemimpin kesatuan sekerja serta pekerja gereja dalam Operasi Lalang, Oktober 1987.

"Cukuplah perbuatan beliau memperalatkan badan kehakiman termasuk bagi memecat Timbalannya ketika itu, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. Dr Mahathir sepatutnya menghabiskan masanya sekarang bermain dengan cucu. "Biarlah pembangkang yang kini mempunyai 82 kerusi Parlimen memantau dan mengawasi kerajaan pimpinan Abdullah. Sokongan Dr Mahathir tidak diperlukan pembangkang untuk memastikan Barisan Nasional (BN) tidak menyalahgunakan kuasa," katanya dalam kenyataan di sini, semalam. Beliau berkata, pembangkang tidak memerlukan orang seperti Dr Mahathir yang sanggup membubarkan Umno pada 1988 dan bertindak seperti diktator, selain menyerang pemimpin kerajaan lain sehingga menjejaskan imej negara dan keyakinan pelabur asing. "Dr Mahathir sepatutnya mengambil sikap berhenti menyerang. Sudah tiba masanya beliau berdamai dan membiarkan pembangkang memantau kerajaan pimpinan Pak Lah," katanya.


Dear Mr Karpal, please correct me if i am wrong. If i remember my history, it was the court (presiding judge: the late Justice Harun Hashim) that ruled UMNO was an illegal party. This came about after a group of UMNO members (the UMNO 11) who were dissatisfied with the 1987 UMNO election result, filed a court case. The rest is history. Because of the ruling, Tun M had to re-established UMNO. and had to start from ground zero. His membership no. is 001, Tun Siti is 002. and TS Sanusi Junid's is 007 (licensed to kill?!). So Tun M did not disband UMNO. It was not even his fault that UMNO was declared illegal. For you, or anyone, to put the blame on him is beyond me. If we really want to blame someone, shouldnt it be the disgruntled UMNO 11?

Let's think. why does Karpal Singh, or the whole opposition for that matter, want Tun M to stop criticising PM Abdullah Badawi? Logically, they should be cheering on Tun M. Pour more fuel to the fire. Any attacks on PM Abdullah Badawi could weaken the government. and the opposition would definitely benefit. law of equilibrium - if one side is weak, the other side would be strong. It seems that Karpal Singh/DAP is 'rescuing' PM Abdullah Badawi. surely that cant be true. unless i woke up in a different country today.

Or with Abdullah Badawi as the PM, they fancy their chances to actually win the next GE? so they need him to continue be the PM. it would be in their best interest. is that why he is jumping to rescue Abdullah Badawi? Karpal to the rescue..you think?


"To understand the heart and mind of a person, look not at what he has already achieved, but at what he aspires to". - Khalil Gibran

Tuesday, April 8, 2008

sacro what?

On page 48 of The Star today, i read a letter to the Editor with the title " The New Malay Dilemma". The writer is one Halimah Mohd Said from Kuala Lumpur. Having read her letter, one came to a conclusion - she is well educated and very perspective.

The thing that really made me think is when she wrote: UMNO is not sacrosanct. Sacrosanct means very sacred or holy. So Puan Halimah is saying UMNO is not sacred. UMNO is not holy. I respect her for saying that.

The way i read her statement is:

ONE. UMNO is not perfect. UMNO is not beyond reproach. UMNO can make mistakes. and if UMNO can make mistakes, leaders of UMNO can also make mistakes. law of logic. as such, UMNO and its leaders must listen and accept criticisms. If UMNO and its leaders think that they can do no wrong, then they are living in fantasy land. definitely not in Malaysia Boleh Land. Coz today in Malaysia Boleh Land, respect for UMNO is no longer there, waning at best. Am i being too dramatic? i hope so. otherwise, that respect may never be re-claimed without a major overhaul. UMNO members talk about leadership change. yes there should be leadership change for the rejuvenation of UMNO to start. but that is only superficial. and the rakyats would know. they can smell it a mile away.

It is no longer a question of should or would. The survival and relevancy of UMNO is at stake. There must be room for debates. There must be room to accommodate multiple views and opinions. Of course some would argue that UMNO does provide that. If you want to express yourself, you can always speak up during UMNO meetings - either at branch, divisional or even national meeting. Really? Plus, all the time, leaders of UMNO would say - if you want to voice your opinions, use the proper channel. What channel?! please tell me. is UMNO annual meeting a channel?

ok let's digress a little bit. as long as you are a member of a branch, you can attend branch annual meeting. (branch is the lowest in UMNO hierarchy.) But you need to be a delegate to attend divisional annual meeting (at branch meeting, they would choose a specified number of people to attend the divisional meeting). Same goes for the national AGM. you need to be a delegate, chosen at divisional level. there would be a proper election (not just a show of hands) to choose the delegates. even Tun Mahathir, after he resigned as party president, he had to contest to be a delegate. unfortunately he lost. mind you, it is a big deal to be a delegate to attend the national AGM. Competition to be delegates could be intense - especially in the UMNO-election year, like this year. so you see. not just anybody can speak in these meetings. only the chosen few. the voice of the grassroot might not be heard at all at the national AGM.

TWO. UMNO is not so sacred that Malays will forever support it. unless it braces change, it will be part of history rather than the maker of history. The relevancy of UMNO has been questioned many times. for me, there are two ways for UMNO to be irrelevant - one, it has achieved all it set out to achieve eg education for the Malays etc etc. therefore, nothing to 'fight' for anymore. Perjuangan sudah selesai. two, when UMNO is no longer in-sync with the Malays. what the Malays want and what UMNO fights for are not in tandem. therefore, UMNO could no longer claim to be representing the Malays. as such, irrelevant. scenario one is unlikely as UMNO's agendas change with time (at least theoretically). so it would always be relevant on this note. scenario two is the most likely to happen and sentence UMNO to its grave. in fact, it is happening now. the younger generation is said to be critical and cynical of UMNO. if it is true, then UMNO must be ready to change and accept new idealism. new ways of doing things. I still believe all Malays want the best for the Malays. just a matter of how to achieve that. For a start, tonite UMNO Youth is having a discussion with a group of young Malays - to get their views and opinions. a little too late? hope not. better late than never.

All this while, maybe UMNO has taken for granted the support of the Malays. That is why some UMNO leaders behave like they are god's gift to the Malays. They forgot who is the master and who is the servant. The Malays have spoken - you ek, we act (ek=eksyen=sombong=show off).

Monday, April 7, 2008

Saboteurs, saboteurs - where are you?

The headline on page 6 of The Star today screamed: "Barisan was sabotaged. PM blames loss of Kedah and Perak on UMNO members." PM Abdullah Badawi said acts of sabotage had taken place in 14 parliamentary and 22 state constituencies in these 2 states during the recent GE. If not for it, BN would not have lost the two-thirds majority and the two state governments.

For me, it is both not surprising and not so important. It is not really rocket science. In many constituencies, if all BN members (members of all 14 BN component parties) were to vote for BN, there is no way BN could lose in those areas. No way! You add up all BN members in a particular area, they would make up the bulk of the voters, thus ensuring BN's grip in that area. These areas are labelled 'white areas' - safe seats, whereby BN would and should win comfortably. Therefore, if BN loses in a white area, you can automatically conclude one thing - BN members did not vote for BN. Straightforward conclusion. So this admission of sabotage is of no significance. What is important is why. You know the disease. and you must also know what causes it. if not, how are you going to fix it.

(Digest this. In 2006, UMNO's Secretary General disclosed that UMNO has 3.2 million members. UMNO has 191 divisions all over the country, except Sarawak. One division represents one parliamentary seat. As such, on average, UMNO has approximately 16,000 members per division. It has been estimated that 15% of the members are non-voters for various reasons eg below the age of 21 etc. Therefore, you have about 13,000 UMNO-member voters per division. of course these are simple calculations. add other members of BN component parties to the figure, and you get the idea.)

PM Abdullah Badawi however declined to elaborate what he meant by sabotage. I am sure he has the necessary evidence. Since he didnt elaborate, we have to assume some types of sabotage occured during the recent GE. Sabotage can take many forms. I have heard many stories - leaders telling their supporters not to help campaign, the Bilik Gerakan (so-called War Room) not properly set-up or manned, posters and other election materials were not distributed etc. If any UMNO members indeed sabotaged the party, i say hang them! figuratively of course. No matter how angry you are towards UMNO (for whatever reason), as a party member, you should not in any way let UMNO be in a disadvantage position during the GE. You should not resort to any dirty tactics to weaken UMNO. You must work for UMNO, and never against it. That is your duty. You as a voter can show your anger at the ballot box. That is your right. If you cant get yourself to vote for the opposition, then either spoil your vote. or dont go to vote at all. Not that i approve. all i am saying, you have options rather than sabotage UMNO with dirty tactics. Not acceptable. Duty vs. right.

According to my Collins Paperback English dictionary, sabotage means deliberate obstruction of or damage to a cause or effort. as such, can the act of voting for a party other than BN be considered as a sabotage, if you are a member of a BN component party, eg UMNO? Based on the definition, it is debatable. If the answer is yes, then, polling stations should only have three rooms/lines - one for BN supporters, one for the opposition parties and one for others.

Actually this question is also applicable in our legislative halls. For example: can a BN MP vote against a certain bill proposed by the government? In current practice, he/she cant. Why? Simple. You were chosen to represent BN. as such, you must at all times, uphold the aspirations of BN. so you are expected to vote for the government. this has led to MPs being labelled as rubber-stamping whatever the government wants to do. To be fair, some BN MPs have been critical on certain issues that compelled the government to revise certain policies. But most of the time, they vote along party lines. The Chief Whip would ensure that. if anybody dares to be different, he/she would be 'whipped'. Literally!

Sunday, April 6, 2008

Eid Mubarak so soon?

Eid Mubarak literally means "Blessed Festival". It is a phrase of greetings used by muslims to congratulate each other on holidays eg eid al-fitr (Hari Raya AidilFitri). But Ramadhan is 6 months away.

The Mubarak i am talking about is MUBARAK (Majlis Bekas Wakil Rakyat) - council of ex people's representatives ie MPs and ADUNs. Basically, it is an organisation of retired politicians. Although they are no longer active in politics, they still give support and views to the government. Why am i talking about them?

Heard that they have requested for an appointment to meet PM Abdullah Badawi soon. Tengku Ahmad Rithaudeen, former Foreign Minister, is said to be leading this delegation. The agenda - resignation of PM Abdullah Badawi. Really?

We will know soon enough. Maybe the festival is early this year.